Starbucks Accused Of Mislabeling 8 'Sugar-Free' Protein Drinks
First reported 5 Oct, 15:32 UTCUpdated 17h ago3 sources
1 left · 1 center · 1 right · Full breakdown
A federal lawsuit filed late Friday in Seattle alleges that eight protein beverages Starbucks sells in the U.S. contain varying amounts of sugar even though the company lists them as sugarless.
Excerpt from HuffPost
Compare the headlines
How outlets on each side framed it
A federal lawsuit filed late Friday in Seattle alleges that eight protein beverages Starbucks sells in the U.S. contain varying amounts of sugar even though the company lists them as sugarless.
The Starbucks website says the beverages are “protein-packed” with “no added sugar”.
Starbucks is facing a consumer lawsuit over claims that the protein drinks labeled "sugar-free" on its cafe menus may actually contain more sugar than a Reese's peanut butter cup.
Full coverage
3 outlets — tap a headline to read it at the source
- Starbucks sued over ‘sugar-free’ claims for protein beverages (opens The Straits Times in a new tab)
The Starbucks website says the beverages are “protein-packed” with “no added sugar”.
- A lawsuit accuses Starbucks of mislabeling 8 'sugar-free' protein drinks (opens The Washington Times in a new tab)
Starbucks is facing a consumer lawsuit over claims that the protein drinks labeled "sugar-free" on its cafe menus may actually contain more sugar than a Reese's peanut butter cup.
- Starbucks Accused Of Mislabeling 8 'Sugar-Free' Protein Drinks (opens HuffPost in a new tab)
A federal lawsuit filed late Friday in Seattle alleges that eight protein beverages Starbucks sells in the U.S. contain varying amounts of sugar even though the company lists them as sugarless.
